Ayodhya Ram Mandir Case | Ram Mandir Supreme Court Final Ruselt

Ayodhya finding reserved by Supreme Court, second largest & longest case ever. This case ram-babri is India's most popular and high profile case .

After forty days supremeo court daily hearings, Supreme Court reserves finding .

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court led by justice Ranjan Gogoi on Wednesday finished the marathon hearing of the decades-old Ramjanmabhumi-Babri house of God title dispute case. Before wrapping up the case, the bench gave the contesting parties 3 days to file written notes on ‘moulding of relief’ or narrowing down the problems on that the court is needed to adjudicate during this case. Ayodhya Ram Mandir and Ayodhya Case Stady .

The Constitution bench has detected the case for forty days, the highest court’s second longest oral hearing in its history. The bench, that additionally includes justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer, is hearing appeals against the Sep thirty, two010 judgement of the Allahabad tribunal that ordered a trilateral division of the controversial 2.77 acres in Ayodhya Ram Mandir

The top court is expected to deliver its ruling by November 17 when Chief Justice Gogoi retires. Here are the 10 top arguments made by the Muslim and Hindu parties to the dispute.

PEOPLE ALSO ASK & SEARCH :-

Why Babri Masjid was demolished?

Who destroyed Ayodhya temple?

How many Karsevak died in Ayodhya?

Who built Babri Masjid?

"Hindu Party"
1. A temple was built centuries ago, possibly by Emperor Vikramaditya and rebuilt around 11th century. The temple was destroyed by Babur in 1526 or possibly by Aurangzeb in the 17th century.

2. Historical texts such as Skanda Purana and later additions, travellers stories and gazettes) show that people have a belief that Ayodhya was the birthplace of god Lord Ram.

3. Islamic texts on the mosque are in violation of the Holy Koran and Hadith

4. Witness evidence shows that the belief has existed for centuries that Ayodhya is the birth place of Lord Ram.

5. An ASI report proves the existence of a temple and its destruction.

"Muslim Party"

6. Mosque has been present at the disputed site since 1528. Physical existence of the mosque is proven by records that it was attacked in 1855, 1934 and a trespass case filed in 1949

7. British government recognised the grant given by Babur, which had been continued by nawabs

8. Various documents of the 1885 suit recognised the existence of mosque. Muslims were in possession of the place throughout and offered Eid prayers till 22, 23 December 1949

9. Insisted that views of historians and mentions in gazettes about the existence of the mosque was a weak argument. Wants the court to rely on the Hindu practice of praying at  Janambhumi as evidence.

10. Contested ASI report saying that its conclusion that a temple structure existed under the mosque was an interpretation and not a scientific fact.